首页> 外文OA文献 >The Continuing Story of the Cost-Effectiveness of Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate versus Transuretheral Resection of the Prostate for the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Obstruction
【2h】

The Continuing Story of the Cost-Effectiveness of Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate versus Transuretheral Resection of the Prostate for the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Obstruction

机译:前列腺光选择性汽化与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗有症状的良性前列腺梗阻的成本效益的持续故事

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract\udBACKGROUND:\ud\udIn 2008, a UK assessment of technologies for benign prostatic obstruction concluded negatively about photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), and the 2010 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance caused several UK institutions to abandon PVP.\udOBJECTIVE:\ud\udTo reassess the costs and effects of PVP versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) on the basis of most recent data.\udMETHODS:\ud\udThe same model was used as in 2008. Transition probabilities were estimated using a Bayesian approach updating the 2008 estimates with data from two meta-analyses and data from GOLIATH, the latest and largest trial comparing PVP with TURP. Utility estimates were from the 2008 assessment, and estimates of resource utilization and costs were updated. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life-years gained, and costs are in UK pounds. The balance between costs and effects was addressed by multivariate sensitivity analysis.\udRESULTS:\ud\udIf the 2010 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence analysis would have updated the cost-effectiveness analysis with figures from its own meta-analysis, it would have estimated the change in quality-adjusted life-years at -0.01 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.05 to 0.01) instead of at -0.11 (95% CI -0.31 to -0.01) as in the 2008 analysis. The GOLIATH estimate of -0.01 (95% CI -0.07 to 0.02) strengthens the conclusion of near equivalence. Estimates of additional costs vary from £491 (£21-£1286) in 2008 to £111 (-£315 to £595) for 2010 and to £109 (-£204 to £504) for GOLIATH. PVP becomes cost saving if more than 32% can be carried out as a day case in the United Kingdom.\udCONCLUSIONS:\ud\udThe available evidence indicates that PVP can be a cost-effective alternative for TURP in a potentially broad group of patients.\ud\udCopyright © 2015 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:摘要\ ud背景:\ ud \ ud在2008年,英国对前列腺良性梗阻技术的评估对前列腺的光选择性汽化(PVP)做出了负面结论,而2010年美国国家健康与护理卓越研究所的指导导致一些英国机构放弃了PVP。 \ ud目标:\ ud \ ud根据最新数据重新评估PVP与经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)的成本和效果。\ udMETHODS:\ ud \ ud与2008年使用的模型相同。评估了转移概率使用贝叶斯方法,使用来自两次荟萃分析的数据和来自GOLIATH的数据(使用PVP与TURP进行比较的最新,规模最大的数据)更新了2008年的估算值。效用估计数来自2008年的评估,并更新了资源利用率和成本的估计数。有效性以获得的质量调整生命年来衡量,成本以英镑为单位。费用和效果之间的平衡通过多元敏感性分析解决。\ udRESULTS:\ ud \ ud如果2010年美国国家卫生与护理卓越研究所的分析将使用其自身的荟萃分析中的数据更新成本效益分析,估计质量调整生命年的变化为-0.01(95%置信区间[CI] -0.05至0.01),而不是2008年的分析结果为-0.11(95%CI -0.31至-0.01)。 GOLIATH估计为-0.01(95%CI为-0.07至0.02)可强化近似等效的结论。估计的额外费用从2008年的491英镑(21英镑至1286英镑)到2010年的111英镑(315英镑至595英镑)和GOLIATH 109英镑(204英镑至504英镑)。如果在英国,每天可以进行32%以上的手术,则PVP可以节省成本。\ ud结论:\ ud \ ud现有证据表明,PVP可以成为潜在人群中TURP的一种经济有效的替代品。\ ud \ ud版权所有©2015国际药物经济学和结果研究协会(ISPOR)。由Elsevier Inc.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号